Azomite International

A Natural Source of Minerals and Trace Elements

AZOMITE® And Shrimp


On-Farm Demonstration in Chonburi Province, 2002

Shrimp Study - Growth Graph

 

Comments: Test weighings of shrimp at 60, 70 and 80 days showed a marked difference in the growth rates of test vs control. The study director then started feeding AZOMITE feed to the control shrimp. After day 80 the graph shows the growth rate of the control shrimp (now eating AZOMITE feed) was parallel to the test shrimp on AZOMITE from start.

 

Shrimp Study - Economic Analysis

Parameter AZOMITE pond Control pond
Total harvest 915.4 kg 833.7 kg
Shrimp price 186 baht/kg 149 baht/kg
Total income 170,264 baht 124,221 baht
Feed cost 37,455 baht 34,395 baht
Fry cost 20,000 baht 20,000 baht
Fuel cost 20,000 baht 20,000 baht
Other cost 50,000 baht 48,000 baht
Profit 42,809 baht 1,826 baht

 

Black Tiger Shrimp
( with and without AZOMITE® )

  • Larval shrimp were grown until they reached PL 15 stage, and then 6 ponds, average surface area of 3,667 M2/HA per pond, were seeded with the PL 15 for a cultivation study. 3 Ponds served as Controls and 3 Ponds were treated with AZOMITE? (Trial)

  • Cultivation was done for 120 days, and both groups received identical feeds (GROBEST)

  • Shrimp were seeded at a density of 30 PL/M2

  • The soil in Trial ponds was treated with AZOMITE? at the rate of 200 Kg/HA

  • Dissolved Oxygen, pH, Phytoplankton & Zooplankton Populations, Growth Rate and Survival were measured

pH and Dissolved Oxygen in Black Tiger Study

 

Phytoplankton (Food for Shrimp) Population (Cell/Litre)

 

Zooplankton Population, Individual/M2
(Many Copepod, Cladocera and Rotifier, Food for Shrimp)

 

Growth of Black Tiger Shrimp
( with and without AZOMITE® )

 

Survival of Black Tiger Shrimp
( with and without AZOMITE® )

 

Overall Conclusion about Black Tiger Shrimp Study

  • AZOMITE® improved Growth Rate (17.5%) and Survival (35%)

  • Zooplankton and Phytoplankton levels were improved substantially by treatment

  • Dissolved oxygen was improved, but the amount of improvement varied from morning to afternoon, and only insignificant changes in pH were noted in treated ponds

  • Overall, the economics of treating bottom soil of ponds is highly favored.

 

Bookmark, Share or Email this page

Home

 


To print this page in Adobe Acrobat format
Click Here